![]() These hacking tests were carried out in a laboratory setting, and would be difficult, if not unrealistic to reproduce. Yet, so far, hackers have always managed to break into facial recognition, fingerprint scanners, palm vein recognition, and more. While hackers were able to trick Apple’s Face ID license detection tool with just a pair of eyeglasses and some tape. A computer-developed wax hand fooled a vein scanner. Combining a picture of a person’s iris with the contact lens gave them access to a Samsung phone. For instance, in the lab, they have unlocked an iPhone using a fingerprint lifted from a piece of glass. In testing activities, hackers have managed to outsmart biometric encryption technologies. However, biometric scanners have proved not to be 100% secure either. If there are enough sensors involved to produce an accurate profile, then it is definitely safer than password protection or key system. ![]() So, in this sense, the security of this technology depends on how well it’s implemented. This is essentially a cost issue the more sensors are utilized to scan a fingerprint or face, the more precise is the resulting biometric profile. More elaborate security methods, and those involving more sensors, tend to deliver higher levels of security. Whether or not a biometric access system provides a higher level of protection depends on the accuracy of the reading technology. And, with all of these less technological solutions, it’s possible for individuals to share their access credentials with unauthorized personnel or to be stolen and used by others. ![]() When relying on electronic keys, security still relies on individuals to report a missing or stolen proximity card immediately so that permissions can be revoked. With traditional keys, a single misplaced key is an instant security threat. Passwords and codes can be stolen, someone can watch it be entered, find where it’s been written down, or just guess it. Key codes, by contrast, are something that individuals need to memorize, without writing it down or saving it anywhere, otherwise anyone who finds it can access the building or the same digital information. Yet, code and password systems are easy to implement. However, many wonder if this development would actually increase commercial security. Passwords are relatively weak as a means of security they’re often out of date and can be changed with a simple request. That’s much easier than remembering and typing in a password. Using your fingerprint to log in is simple just put your finger on the reader and you’re identified.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |